There's no document provided, I'll answer to the best of my knowledge
The abolitionist John Brown attempted to garner attention and do his part to abolish slavery by murdering three individuals who supported slavery, and later tried to host an armed uprising where he would lead slaves to raid a federal army in Harper's Ferry. The attack was unsuccessful, and he was later executed. His actions were radical, and in my opinion very misguided and would only lead to more violence.
That is my take on it, though I recommend you get your own opinion because that is a very opinionated topic.
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
Answer:
This principle means people of federal territories should decide for themselves whether their territories would enter the Union as free or slave states.
Explanation:
Groups have an influence on what is acceptable and what is not during CONVENTIONAL <span>stage of ethical decision making
</span>
in the CONVENTIONAL stage of ethical decision making, the group started to develop a sense of morality in order to fulfill society's expetation toward them. This lead to a development of moral guideline that determine what actions are wrong and what actions are acceptable.
Answer:
The answer is:
Your (OBJECTIVE) is the goal you want to achieve.
Your (FOCUS) is how you stay on track to achieve your goal.
Your decision to (PERSEVERE) is the decision to keep trying, no matter what gets in your way.
Explanation:
Definitions:
persevere: to continue trying to achieve something in spite of difficulties
Objective: to everall goal of a person.
Focus: to direct your attention to a certain thing.
I also got the answer right.
