Answer:
$27,642.86
Explanation:
To determine the price Marko will pay today to buy ABC Co, one has to find the present value of the cash flows.
Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows.
Present value can be calculated using a financial calculator.
Cash flow in year one = $6300
Cash flow in year two = $11,300
Cash flow in year three = $17,500
I = 11%
Present value = $27,642.86
To find the present value using a financial calacutor:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
I hope my answer helps you
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
A privilege
Good Luck! <span />
Answer:
$-8,609
Explanation:
Calculation for How much would you need to set aside
Year Cashflows PVF 5% Present values
1 -500 *0.952381 =-476.19
2 -650(500+150) *0.907029 =-589.569
3 -800(650+150) *0.863838 =-691.07
4 -950(800+150) *0.822702 =-781.567
5 -1100(950+150) *0.783526 =-861.879
6 -1250(1100+150) *0.746215 =-932.769
7 -1400(1250+150) *0.710681 =-994.954
8 -1550(1400+150) *0.676839 =-1049.1
9 -1700(1550+150) *0.644609 =-1095.84
10 -1850(1700+150) *0.613913 =-1135.74
PV=Present value $-8,609
Therefore the amount you will need to set aside is $-8,609
The correct answer is B. Rural areas
Explanation:
High population densities, as well as high housing prices, are mainly found in cities or nearby areas as most jobs and industries are located in these areas. This increases not only the number of people that live in these zones but also the price of housing as the prices of properties are higher due to a higher demand. This means, zones such as inner-city neighborhoods, suburbs, and similar are highly populated and the house prices are high.
On the other hand, nowadays rural areas have a small population density because most people are not interested in living in rural areas as it would take more time to get to cities where jobs and major industries are. Similarly, the housing prices are lower because the demand or number of people interested in buying properties is lower, which makes general housing prices lower.