Answer:
B) No fallacy.
Explanation:
In this example, the speaker is using the authority of Professor Stevens as a way to justify the claim he is making. This is an appeal to authority, and there is no consensus as to whether this is a valid claim or a fallacy. Some authors consider this a valid claim, as the authority is a legitimate expert in the subject. Other authors consider it a fallacy, and it receives the name of <em>argumentum ad verecundiam</em>. This is based on the idea that even an expert can be wrong, and therefore, this is not an appropriate source of evidence.
Answer:as the water flows through a barrage at high and low tides,turning the plant’s Turbine.
Explanation: Don't fully trust me i just going of what i know which is the water goes through it at high and low speeds and turns the turbine and the
Turbine makes electricity while spinning
This is a passage from a book called <em>Talking About Our Troubles</em> by Mark Rutherford, in which he advocates that the only way in which people can think is through talking, and that the speech is the manufacture of the expression of opinion. He also suggests that people might also talk to others about their troubles in an attempt to lessen the other's.
