Question

Jordy tried to prove that △ A B E ≅ △ B C D △ABE≅△BCDtriangle, A, B, E, \cong, triangle, B, C, D. A A B B C C D D E E Statement Reason 1 ∠ B C D ≅ ∠ A B E ∠BCD≅∠ABEangle, B, C, D, \cong, angle, A, B, E Given 2 ∠ C D B ≅ ∠ B E A ∠CDB≅∠BEAangle, C, D, B, \cong, angle, B, E, A Given 3 B D ↔ ∥ A E ↔ BD ∥ AE B, D, with, \overleftrightarrow, on top, \parallel, A, E, with, \overleftrightarrow, on top Given 4 ∠ C B D ≅ ∠ B A E ∠CBD≅∠BAEangle, C, B, D, \cong, angle, B, A, E Corresponding angles on parallel lines are congruent. 5 △ A B E ≅ △ B C D △ABE≅△BCDtriangle, A, B, E, \cong, triangle, B, C, D Angle-angle-angle congruence What is the first error Jordy made in his proof? Choose 1 answer: Choose 1 answer: (Choice A) A Jordy used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles. (Choice B) B Jordy only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion. (Choice C) C Jordy establish

Answer 1

For Jordy to prove that ΔABE ≅ ΔBCD, at least one side in triangle ΔABE

should be congruent to the corresponding side in ΔBCD.

The correct option is choice B

• (B) Jordy only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruency criterion.

Reasons:

Statement ${}$                   Reason

1∠BCD ≅ ∠ABE ${}$          1. Given

2. ∠CDB ≅ ∠BEA ${}$       2. Given

3. $\overleftrightarrow{BD} \parallel \overleftrightarrow{AE}$ ${}$                 3. Given

4. ∠CBD ≅ ∠BAE ${}$       4. Corresponding angles on parallel lines are congruent

5. ΔABE ≅ ΔBCD ${}$       5. Angle-angle-angle congruence

The rules for congruency of two triangles are; SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS, and RHS.

The above acronyms stand for;

• SSS: Side-Side-Side congruency postulate; The three sides of each triangle are congruent

• SAS: Side-Angle-Side congruency postulate; Two sides and an included angle in one triangle are congruent to two sides and an included angle in another triangle.

• ASA: Angle-Side-Angle congruency postulate; Two angles and an included side are congruent in both triangles.

• AAS: Angle-Angle-Side congruency postulate; Two angles and a non included side are congruent in both triangles.

• RHS: The hypotenuse and one side in two right triangles are congruent

Therefore;

Jordy only established the congruency of the angles which are some of

the necessary conditions for congruency criterion. A side in ΔABE should

also be congruent to a corresponding side in ΔBCD in order to complete

the criteria for congruency.

Learn more about congruency rules here:

brainly.com/question/2292380

Answer 2

Answer:

D. Jordy used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1

The diagram does support the claim that \angle BCD \cong \angle ABE∠BCD≅∠ABEangle, B, C, D, \cong, angle, A, B, E because they both have double arcs.

Step 1 is correct.

Step 2

The diagram does support the claim that \angle CDB \cong \angle BEA∠CDB≅∠BEAangle, C, D, B, \cong, angle, B, E, A because they both have a single arc.

Step 2 is correct.

Step 3

The diagram does support the claim that \overleftrightarrow{BD} \parallel \overleftrightarrow{AE}  

BD

∥  

AE

B, D, with, \overleftrightarrow, on top, \parallel, A, E, with, \overleftrightarrow, on top because they both have an arrow mark.

Step 3 is correct.  

Step 4

Angles \angle CBD∠CBDangle, C, B, D and \angle BAE∠BAEangle, B, A, E are corresponding angles on \overleftrightarrow{BD}  

BD

B, D, with, \overleftrightarrow, on top and \overleftrightarrow{AE}  

AE

A, E, with, \overleftrightarrow, on top with the transversal \overline{AC}  

AC

start overline, A, C, end overline.

From step 3, we know that \overleftrightarrow{BD} \parallel \overleftrightarrow{AE}  

BD

∥  

AE

B, D, with, \overleftrightarrow, on top, \parallel, A, E, with, \overleftrightarrow, on top.

Corresponding angles on parallel lines are congruent.

Step 4 is correct.

Step 5

Jordy did establish the conditions for claiming that the figures had all congruent angles.

From step 1, we know \angle BCD \cong \angle ABE∠BCD≅∠ABEangle, B, C, D, \cong, angle, A, B, E.

From step 2, we know \angle CDB \cong \angle BEA∠CDB≅∠BEAangle, C, D, B, \cong, angle, B, E, A.

From step 4, we know \angle CBD \cong \angle BAE∠CBD≅∠BAEangle, C, B, D, \cong, angle, B, A, E.

However, angle-angle-angle congruence is not a valid reason for claiming that two triangles are congruent, so Jordy's reason is inappropriate.

[Why isn't AAA a valid congruence criterion?]

Jordy used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.