10*30=300
10*4=40
6*30=180
6*4=24
add them up: 300+40+180+24=544
The researcher's scientific/alternative hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to differences in women's attentional control performance.
The researcher's null hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to no difference in women's attentional control performance.
The type of sample which the researcher is using is:
A disadvantage to using this sample type is:
The thing which the researcher can conclude about these data is:
- It is conclusive based on the reaction of the women to the independent variables.
If, in the population, women actually show NO difference in attentional control performance after drinking black tea versus coffee, the type of statistical error which the researcher has made is:
<h3>What is a Scientific Hypothesis?</h3>
This refers to the difference between two variables which is discovered during a scientific research and is an observed pattern.
Read more about scientific hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/896413
Answer:
f(x) = x² + 8 - 16x
= x² - 16x + 8
= (x² - 16x + 64) - 64 + 8
= (x + 8)² - 56
For this case we have a function of the form:
Where,
A: initial population of bacteria
b: growth rate
x: number of hours
Since the diameter is double every hour, then:
We must now look for the value of A.
To do this, we evaluate an ordered pair of the graph:
For (1, 2):
Clearing A we have:
Then, the function is given by:
For after 9 hours we have:
Answer:
the diameter of the bacteria after 9 hours is:
