Answer:
I'm not an expert here, this is a best guess!
But I would say if there is no chance that of him incurring excess costs of less than $500, then he knows without insurance he'll end up paying at least $500, possibly more out of pocket, without the insurance.
so I would say He ends up spending the least amount out if pocket by going with option A. for $75. that's $75 out of pocket with no deductible and it covers his $500+ in excess costs....B and C would also cover the excess, but would each cost $140 or $275 out of pocket at the end of the day....
with that being said, I'd say it's worth it to buy the insurance....even if he doesn't have any excess costs, he's spent $75 dollars for the peace of mind to know he's covered either way, and if he does incur the excess costs he's spent $75 rather that $500+....Even if the excess charges are only $100, which it says there is no chance of happening, but still, then he's still saved $25 altogether. Unless I'm reading it wrong, Option A saves him the most money either way, and is worth it to buy the insurance!
Let <em>f(x)</em> be the sum of the geometric series,
for |<em>x</em>| < 1. Then taking the derivative gives the desired sum,
Assume that the bank balance started at zero. Enter the income and outgo in chronological order: $300 - $50 - $75 + $225
Find the sum. This sum will represent the amount left in the account after the $225 deposit:
$250 - $75 + $225, or
$175 + $225 = $400 The final balance will be $400.
Answer:
well apperently all will ride home but i need you to type the question correctly so i know what your asking. :)
Step-by-step explanation:
