Answer:
Samantha will be willing to pay $ 2,600. The right answer is B.
Explanation:
Acording to the details, the probability of loss in case of Samantha's neighborhood is 25%.
Hence, the expected loss to her will be = 25/100 * 10000 = $2500
Samantha is willing to pay $100 over her expected loss, hence the amount that Samantha be willing to pay = ($2500 + $100 ) = $2600
Samantha will be willing to pay $2600
The answer is <span>The start-up costs in a monopolistically competitive industry are low.</span>
First, we calculate for the effective annual interest given the interest in the scenario.
ieff = (1 + i/m)^m - 1
Substituting the values,
ieff = (1 + 0.04/12)^12 - 1 = 0.0407
The effective interest is equal to 4.07%.
The future amount after 2 years,
F = ($6000) x (1.0407)^2 = $6498.86
Answer:
The answer is: C) lose because he will not be able to prove reliance on the misrepresentation.
Explanation:
In order for Larson to be able to rescind the contract, he would have to prove that he had reasonable reliance that Robert Redford owned that specific car. Reasonable reliance refers to a person believing something to be a fact, which any other person could reasonably believe in as well.
But exactly how could he prove that someone else might also believe that the car was previously owned by Robert Redford? I find it very doubtful that he can prove that.
An institution that brings together buyers and sellers.
