All categories

2 years ago

Tensions that led to the French and Indian War were based on competition among

Business

2 answers:

kumpel [21]2 years ago

6 0

B) European colonial powers.

vodka [1.7K]2 years ago

6 0

Explanation:

French and Indian War, American phase of a worldwide nine years’ war (1754–63) fought between France and Great Britain. (The more-complex European phase was the Seven Years’ War [1756–63].) It determined control of the vast colonial territory of North America. Three earlier phases of this extended contest for overseas mastery included King William’s War (1689–97), Queen Anne’s War (1702–13), and King George’s War (1744–48).

You might be interested in

Which of the following statements is true a. in market equilibrium there are unconsummated value-creating transactions b. in m

Svetlanka [38]

Answer: C. in market equilibrium there are no unconsummated wealth-creating transactions

Explanation:Market equilibrium is a term in Macroeconomics used to describe the price at which the Quantity of goods demanded is equal to the Quantity of goods supplied.

Wealth-creating transactions are money making transactions, these transactions are those that takes place and are paid for.

IN A MARKET EQUILIBRIUM THE QUANTITY OF GOODS DEMANDED IS EQUAL TO THE QUANTITY OF GOODS SUPPLIED MAKING THE ECONOMY TO HAVE NO UNCONSUMMATED WEALTH-CREATING TRANSACTIONS.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Wilma needed to fill a position that had been open for several weeks. she knew what her perfect candidate would be like but so f

s2008m [1.1K]

The decision making method that Wilma uses is the bounded rationality. It is a type of decision making with only a short time they acquire in deciding up decisions in which Wilma has been doing in the scenario above. This type of decision making also allows a person to decide with only the few decisions that couldn't suffice them. This decision making is being portrayed in the given scenario above.

7 0

3 years ago

Bill currently uses his entire budget to purchase 5 cans of Pepsi and 3 hamburgers per week. The price of Pepsi is $1 per can,

FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

Option (B) is correct.

Explanation:

The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:

$\frac{MU_x}{P_x}=\frac{MU_y}{P_y}$

It is given that,

price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can

price of a hamburger(y) = $2

Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4

Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6

Hence,

$\frac{4}{1}>\frac{6}{2}$

4 > 3

Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.

Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.

So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.

6 0

3 years ago

LBC Corporation makes and sells a product called Product WZ. Each unit of Product WZ requires 2.7 hours of direct labor at the r

In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

$ 2,829,276

Explanation:

The budgeted direct labour cost is going to be based on the budgeted production units.

Production budget = sales budget + closing inventory -opening inventory

Production budget = 46,000 - 140 + 580 = 45,560

Labour budget = Production budget× hours per unit

= 45,560× 2.7 hrs × $23

= $ 2,829,276

6 0

2 years ago

Bundling:__.

Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

Explanation:

Bundling is when separate products of a company are combined together and sold to customers usually at a lower price

6 0

3 years ago