Answer:
well deal with is kid... idc go and get it
Explanation:
The <u>moral intensity</u> of an issue is higher when the consequences for others are potentially large, the consequences are relatively immediate and likely to occur, and the potential victims are psychologically or physically close to the decision maker.
Explanation:
Moral intensity defines the degree that an individual or people considers or sees or relates an issue as an ethical issue.
Various factors determine this moral intensity like; the magnitude and effect of the consequences, the temporal proximity and immediacy of the consequences and social consensus.
The magnitude of the consequence defines the outcome of an action.
Temporal immediacy defines the interval between the time of action and the occurrence or onset of the consequence which details about when consequences are likely to occur after the action.
Proximity details about how close (psychologically and emotionally) the decision-maker is to the person who can be affected by the decision
Honestly I wouldnt take my advice because I know nothing really about this but I believe its either B or D. But I'm more lenient on D because the patient could be having a allergic reaction to the medicine so that it may not have developed into Aids just yet. but I also said B because it may be a likely chance that it has evolved into Aids BUT I have no idea what a CD4+ count is so sorry if I wasn't much help lol
the correct answer is B, it is safer.
