1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastovalidia [21]
3 years ago
5

Math pls help!! answers?

Mathematics
1 answer:
statuscvo [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: Choice B) Infinitely many solutions

  • one solution: x = 8, y = -7/2, z = 0
  • another solution: x = -12, y = 13/2, z = 10

=======================================================

Explanation:

Here's the starting original augmented matrix.

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}  1 & 0 & 2 & 8\\5 & 1 & 9 & 73/2\\-4 & 0 & -8 & -32\\\end{array}\right]

We'll multiply everything in row 3 (abbreviated R3) by the value -1/4 or -0.25, which will make that -4 in the first column turn into a 1.

We use this notation to indicate what's going on: (-1/4)*R3 \to R3

That notation says "multiply everything in R3 by -1/4, then replace the old R3 with the new corresponding values".

So we have this next step:

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}  1 & 0 & 2 & 8\\5 & 1 & 9 & 73/2\\1 & 0 & 2 & 8\\\end{array}\right]\begin{array}{l}  \ \\\ \\(-1/4)*R3 \to R3\\\end{array}

Notice that the new R3 is perfectly identical to R1.

So we can subtract rows R1 and R3, and replace R3 with the result of nothing but 0's

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}  1 & 0 & 2 & 8\\5 & 1 & 9 & 73/2\\0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\\end{array}\right]\begin{array}{l}  \ \\\ \\R3-R1 \to R3\\\end{array}

Whenever you get an entire row of 0's, it <u>always</u> means there are infinitely many solutions.

-------------------

Now let's handle the second row. That 5 needs to turn into a 0. We can multiply R1 by 5, and subtract that from R2.

So we need to compute 5*R1-R2 and have that replace R2.

\left[\begin{array}{ccc|c}  1 & 0 & 2 & 8\\0 & 1 & -1 & -7/2\\0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\\end{array}\right]\begin{array}{l}  \ \\5*R1-R2 \to R2\ \\\ \\\end{array}

Notice that in the third column of R2, we have 9-5*2 = 9-10 = -1. So we have -1 replace the 9. In the fourth column of R2, we have 73/2 - 5*8 = -7/2. So the -7/2 replaces the 73/2.

--------------------

At this point, the augmented matrix is in RREF form. RREF stands for Reduced Row Echelon Form. It seems a bit odd that the "F" of "RREF" stands for "form" even though we say "form" right after "RREF", but I digress.

Because the matrix is in RREF form, this means R1 and R2 lead to these equations:

R1 : 1x+0y+2z = 8\\ R2: 0z+1y-1z = -7/2

which simplify to

R1: x+2z = 8\\R2: y-z = -7/2

Let's get the z terms to each side like so:

x+2z = 8\\x = -2z+8\\\text{ and }\\y-z = -7/2\\y = z-7/2\\

Therefore, all of the solutions are of the form (x,y,z) = (-2z+8, z-7/2, z) where z is any real number.

If z is allowed to be any real number, then we can simply pick any number we want to replace it. We consider z to be the "free variable", in that it's free to be whatever it wants. The values of x and y will depend on what we pick for z.

So the concept of "infinitely many solutions" doesn't exactly mean we can pick just <em>any</em> triple for x,y,z (admittedly it would be nice to randomly pick any 3 numbers off the top of my head and be done right away). Instead, we can pick anything we want for z, and whatever we picked, will directly determine x and y. The x and y are locked into place so to speak.

Let's say we picked z = 0.

That would lead to...

x = -2z+8\\x = -2(0)+8\\x = 8\\\text{ and }\\y = z-7/2\\y = 0-7/2\\y = -7/2\\

So z = 0 would lead to x = 8 and y = -7/2

Rearranging the items in alphabetical order gets us:

x = 8, y = -7/2, z = 0

We have one solution of (x,y,z) = (8, -7/2, 0)

Now let's say we picked z = 10

x = -2z+8\\x = -2(10)+8\\x = -12\\\text{ and }\\y = z-7/2\\y = 10-7/2\\y = 13/2\\

So we have x = -12, y = -13/2, z = 10

Another solution is (x,y,z) = (-12, 13/2, 10)

There's nothing special about z = 0 or z = 10. You can pick any two real numbers you want for z. Just be sure to recalculate the x and y values of course.

To verify each solution, you'll need to plug them back into the original equations formed by the original augmented matrix. After simplifying, you should get the same thing on both sides.

You might be interested in
Karl is building a rectangular garden bed. The length is 6 feet. She has 20 feet of boards to make the sides. Write and solve an
natali 33 [55]

Answer:

The width of the garden bed must be less than or equal to 4 feet.

w\leq4

Explanation:

Given that;

She has 20 feet of boards to make the sides.

The perimeter of the garden bed must not be more than 20 feet

\begin{gathered} P=2l+2w\leq20 \\ 2l+2w\leq20 \end{gathered}

Given;

The length is 6 feet;

l=6

To get the inequality for the width w, let us substitute the value of the length into the inequality above and simplify;

\begin{gathered} 2l+2w\leq20 \\ 2(6)+2w\leq20 \\ 12+2w\leq20 \\ 2w\leq20-12 \\ 2w\leq8 \\ \frac{2w}{2}\leq\frac{8}{2} \\ w\leq4 \end{gathered}

Therefore, the width of the garden bed must be less than or equal to 4 feet.

w\leq4

8 0
1 year ago
Country Financial, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age and older to determine if personal financial fitness
Yakvenalex [24]

Complete Question

Country financials, a financial services company, uses surveys of adults age 18 and older to determine if personal financial fitness is changing over time. In February 2012, a sample of 1000 adults showed 410 indicating that their financial security was more that fair. In Feb 2010, a sample of 900 adults showed 315 indicating that their financial security was more than fair.

a

State the hypotheses that can be used to test for a significant difference between the population proportions for the two years.

b

What is the sample proportion indicating that their  financial security was more that fair in 2012?In 2010?

c

Conduct the hypothesis test and compute the p-value.At a .05 level of significance what is your conclusion?

Answer:

a

The null hypothesis is  H_o :  p_1 = p_2

The  alternative hypothesis is   H_a :  p_1  \ne  p_2

b

in 2012  \r  p_1  =0.41

in 2010  \r  p_2  =0.35  

c

The  p-value  is  p-value = 0.0072

The conclusion is

There is  sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of those indicating that  financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of  those indicating that financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  sample size in 2012 is  n_1  =  1000

    The  number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is  k  =  410  

     The  sample  size in 2010  is  n_2  =  900

   The  number that indicated that their finance was more than fail is  u  =  315

     The  level of significance is  \alpha  =  0.05[/ex]The null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o :  p_1 = p_2

The  alternative hypothesis is   H_a :  p_1  \ne  p_2

Generally the sample proportion for  2012 is mathematically represented as

     \r  p_1  =  \frac{k}{n_1}

=>   \r  p_1  =  \frac{410}{1000}

=>   \r  p_1  =0.41

Generally the sample proportion for  2010 is mathematically represented as

      \r  p_2  =  \frac{u}{n_2}

=>   \r  p_2  =  \frac{315}{900}

=>   \r  p_2  =0.35    

Generally the pooled sample proportion is mathematically represented as

      \r p =  \frac{k + u }{n_1 + n_2}

=>     \r p =  \frac{410 + 315 }{1000+ 900}

=>      \r p =  0.3816

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

     z =  \frac{( \r p_1 - \r p_2 ) - 0}{\sqrt{\r p (1 - \r p ) ( \frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} )}  }

 z =  \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )}  }    

 

 z =  \frac{( 0.41 -0.35 ) - 0}{\sqrt{0.3816 (1 - 0.3816 ) ( \frac{1}{1000} +\frac{1}{900} )}  }

   z  =  2.688

Generally the p- value  is mathematically represented as  

      p-value = 2 P(Z >2.688  )

From the z -table  

      P(Z > 2.688) = 0.0036

So  

      p-value = 2 *0.0036

        p-value = 0.0072

So from the p-value  obtained we see that p-value  <  \alpha so we reject the null hypothesis

Thus there is  sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2010 is different from the proportion of financial security is more fair in Feb 2012.

5 0
3 years ago
Hellllllllllllllllllllllllllp
murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

\begin{cases}y=-5x+1\\y=5x-4 \end{cases}

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope-intercept form of a <u>linear equation</u>:

\boxed{y=mx+b}

where:

  • m is the slope.
  • b is the y-intercept (where the line crosses the y-axis).

<u>Slope formula</u>

\boxed{\textsf{slope}\:(m)=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}}

<u>Equation 1</u>

<u />

Define two points on the line:

  • \textsf{Let }(x_1,y_1)=(-1, 6)
  • \textsf{Let }(x_2,y_2)=(0, 1)

<u>Substitute</u> the defined points into the slope formula:

\implies \textsf{slope}\:(m)=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}=\dfrac{1-6}{0-(-1)}=-5

From inspection of the graph, the line crosses the y-axis at y = 1 and so the y-intercept is 1.

Substitute the found slope and y-intercept into the slope-intercept formula to create an equation for the line:

y=-5x+1

<u>Equation 2</u>

<u />

Define two points on the line:

  • \textsf{Let }(x_1,y_1)=(1, 1)
  • \textsf{Let }(x_2,y_2)=(0, -4)

<u>Substitute</u> the defined points into the slope formula:

\implies \textsf{slope}\:(m)=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}=\dfrac{-4-1}{0-1}=5

From inspection of the graph, the line crosses the y-axis at y = -4 and so the y-intercept is -4.

Substitute the found slope and y-intercept into the slope-intercept formula to create an equation for the line:

y=5x-4

<u>Conclusion</u>

Therefore, the system of linear equations shown by the graph is:

\begin{cases}y=-5x+1\\y=5x-4 \end{cases}

Learn more about systems of linear equations here:

brainly.com/question/28164947

brainly.com/question/28093918

5 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
How much tip should you leave on a $54.50 bill if you want to tip 15%?<br> pls help
aniked [119]

Answer:

$62.68

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply 54.50 by .15

round to the nearest 100th

8 0
3 years ago
Solve the proportional equation b/10=3/5
ra1l [238]

Answer: b is 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Set the proportions up and solve for b

b. 3

---- = ------

10. 5

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Choose all the statements that correctly explain why this shape is an obtuse isosceles triangle.it has 3 sides that are all equa
    7·1 answer
  • a female monkey is 3 3/7 feet tall. a male monkey is about 3 2/5 feet tall. which of the two monkeys is taller?
    6·1 answer
  • The chess club has 12 boys, 16 girls, and 2 coaches. Wrote the following ratios in the simplest form. Boys to girls. girls to bo
    8·1 answer
  • P=$222 r=12% Y=10 A=?
    5·1 answer
  • Felicia owes her Dad $5.00. She earns $12.00 doing chores. How much did Felicia receive after her Dad took out what she owed him
    13·2 answers
  • N/A yhhhhb hhhbbub bb he hb hb hb h. Hb hb h
    15·2 answers
  • A copy machine makes 231 copies in 5 minutes and 15 seconds. How many copies does it make per minute?
    14·1 answer
  • 6.6=w-1.2 What is w??
    6·2 answers
  • PLZZZZZZZZ HELP IM VERY STUCK ON THIS
    13·1 answer
  • An ostrich is
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!