Answer:
448 meters
Explanation:
every second it moves 8 meters, so all you have to do is multiply 56x8 or 8x56 either way it is the same thing and you will get the same answer
Answer:
1) The charge on the outer shell is +4·Q
2) The charge on the inner shell is +Q
Explanation:
1) The given parameters of the spherical shell are;
The net charge on the spherical shell = 3·Q
The point charge surrounded by the spherical shell = -Q
Let 'x' represent the charge on the outer shell, and let 'y', represent the charge on the inner shell, we have;
The net charge, 3·Q = -q + x
∴ x = 3·Q + Q = 4·Q
The charge on the outer shell, x = 4·Q
2) The net charge in the shell is zero, therefore, the charge on the inner shell, 'y', is given as follows;
-Q + y = 0
∴ y = +Q
The charge on the inner shell, y = +Q
Density is the mass of a substance per unit volume.
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
The Correct choice is ~
_________________________________
