All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is a victimless crime? a. Auto theft c. Larceny b. Illegal drug use d. Murder.

Social Studies

1 answer:

arsen [322]3 years ago

6 0

｡˚.✧‧₊˚. •｡˚✧₊˚.•

Illegal drug use is the only one of these options that doesn't have a victim.

explanation:

Auto theft victim would be the owner of said stolen car, murder would be the one who was murdered, and larceny's victim would be the owner of said property that had been stolen from.

Therefor, the answer is illegal drug use.

｡˚.✧‧₊˚. •｡˚✧₊˚.•

You might be interested in

What were concentration camps? _________________________________________________________________________________________________

vichka [17]

Answer:

concentration camps are where Jews were imprisoned by the Nazis located in Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe; three different kinds of camps are : transit, labor, and extermination

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Watsons go to birmingham question :PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE 43 POINTS PLEASEEE AND BRAINLIEST

erik [133]

Answer:

Dear grandma,

I really enjoyed our family trip. If you were Bryon, Kenny, or Joey, things would have been way more fun. In our trip, we went to the beach, you would have loved. Then we rented a hotel room with a great view of the city and the beach. We even had an extra bed in our room and then we all realized we should have invited you. Later we went to go eat at a fancy sea-food restaurant which was delicious. I thought that you would have liked it very much.

Explanation:

From what I understood this is what you had to have done.

(Can I get Brainliest) PLZ

3 0

3 years ago

Define the Great Society, and discuss how activists and President Johnson worked together to create a Great Society with “abunda

Vadim26 [7]

The Great Society were programs developed and put forth by Democrat President L. Johnson in 1964 with the goal of eradicating poverty and racial injustices. Spending for these programs were put towards education, urban issues, health care, transportation, and poverty (present day Medicare, Medicaid, and federal funding for education).

Johnson and activists worked together to put forth studies of American socities, reported on findings to corresponding agencies, and assisted many civil rights laws including the Civil Rights law of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, The Immigration and nationality Services Act of 1965, and the Civil Rights Act of 1968.

4 0

3 years ago

To better understand bulimia among college students, a researcher lives in a female freshman dorm for the fall semester to obser

Zanzabum

The correct answer is that the limitation of this field study "determining direction of causality would be difficult because data are correlation & so many factors affect real life situations, it would be hard to control all the variables that creates findings harder to interpret."
In the given situation, because of the many factors present in the study and it affects real life situations, which are uncontrollable, which is why this study has this kind of limitation.

4 0

3 years ago

Briefly summarize the facts of the Dred Scott case and discuss the impact that the decision had on the growing conflict between

Viktor [21]

Answer:

"In April 1846, Dred and Harriet filed separate lawsuits for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court against Irene Emerson based on two Missouri statutes. One statute allowed any person of any color to sue for wrongful enslavement. The other stated that any person taken to a free territory automatically became free and could not be re-enslaved upon returning to a slave state.

Neither Dred nor Harriet Scott could read or write, and needed both logistical and financial support to plead their case. They received it from their church, abolitionists and an unlikely source, the Blow family who had once owned them.

Since Dred and Harriet Scott had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory — both free domains — they hoped they had a persuasive case. When they went to trial on June 30, 1847, however, the court ruled against them on a technicality and the judge granted a retrial.

The Scott’s went to trial again in January 1850 and won their freedom. Irene appealed the case to the Missouri Supreme Court which combined Dred and Harriet’s cases and reversed the lower court’s decision in 1852, making Dred Scott and his family slaves again.

In November 1853, Scott filed a federal lawsuit with the United States Circuit Court for the District of Missouri. By this time, Irene had transferred Scott and his family to her brother, John Sanford (although it was determined later that she retained ownership). On May 15, 1854, the federal court heard Dred Scott v. Sanford and ruled against Scott, holding him and his family in slavery.

In December 1854, Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The trial began on February 11, 1856. By this time, the case had gained notoriety and Scott received support from many abolitionists, including powerful politicians and high-profile attorneys. But on March 6, 1857, in the infamous Dred Scott decision, Scott lost his fight for freedom again...... By the time the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Dred Scott decision, Irene had married her second husband, Calvin Chaffee, a U.S. congressman and abolitionist. Upset upon learning his wife still owned the most infamous slave of the time, he sold Scott and his family to Taylor Blow, the son of Peter Blow, Scott’s original owner.

Taylor freed Scott and his family on May 26, 1857. Scott found work as a porter in a St. Louis hotel, but didn’t live long as a free man. At about 59 years of age, Scott died from tuberculosis on September 17, 1858."

Explanation:

Source: https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/dred-scott-case

3 0

3 years ago