No because if you have the same answer only one could be correct
Answer:
either chamber of Congress by a senator or representative who sponsors it.
Explanation:
Answer:
Expert witnesses are important to many cases. They help jurors understand complex and nuanced information, they provide a sense of objectivity and credibility, and they integrate with the legal team to enhance the strength of the entire case.
Answer: 60 days
Explanation:
The amount of time that an underage person caught with alcohol will spend in prison depends on the state they are in and how the state classifies the action. In some states it is a simple misdemeanor while in others it is a felony.
In states such as Florida, the first offence will earn the person a second degree misdemeanor and could see them in jail for up to 60 days as well as their license being suspended for between 6 months to a year.
Answer:
Graham's defense is incorrect.
Explanation:
An expression used in this case was “inherent risk”, which establishes the hypothesis of anomalies and errors that compromise any activity and should be seen as an anticipation of what may not work. When planning an activity, you need to be aware of the risks of that activity to achieve the intended goal without obstacles that may interfere with the process required to achieve the goal.
According to Graham's defense there was an inherent risk that covers the snowboard that Graham is practicing and was ignored by Madigan, so Graham is not guilty of any charges. However, the inherent risk of sport does not include snowballing, as Graham was doing. For this reason, we can say that Graham was being negligent and distracted while throwing snowballs. This negligence caused the accident that hurt Madigan, so Graham is guilty and Madigan should be compensated.
