The below statements are what I believe about removing Monuments
- Why are we moving them (AKA taking them down)?
Are we just moving it for room? Why are we moving it? For room, for a building, is that honorable? No, I don't think it is
- Are we really thinking about the monuments use
If were removing a monument that has a significant meaning or remembrance of something, than that's disrespectful and why did we put it up in the first place
- Do the people like it, or not?
This kind of relates to the first answer. Are we just moving it to put in a building or something like that. If the government has decided to remove it, are they thinking about if the people like it?
There are my answers. Best of luck,
- Ari -
Answer: A. Stare decisis
Explanation: Stare decisis simply means aligning with precedence. Stare decisis is a legal culture which necessitates the court to look into preceeding cases when making rulings on similar cases. It obligates the court that when making ruling on a certain cases, rulings preceeding cases of similar nature, fact and structure must be considered.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the court is following legal precedent set by the ruling of a previous case in other to make decision on a current case. Therefore, the second case is an example of stare decisis.
Answer:
the moon orbits the Earth while the earth rotates and orbits around the Sun
Explanation:
Answer:
B. genuineness, unconditional positive regard, and empathic understanding.
Explanation:
Client-centered therapy is a type of psychotherapy developed by psychologist Carl Rogers between the 1940s and the 1980s. The main idea behind this type of therapy is that people have an innate desire for growth and fulfillment, and that it is the job of the therapist to capitalize on these natural tendencies. Therefore, the therapist should show the qualities of genuineness, unconditional positive regard, and empathic understanding in order to contribute to the patient's self-actualization.
The answer to this question would be A and B.
