Congress can come up with laws, and send them to the president for approval. If it is vetoed, there are ways that Congress can override that. That is how they share responsibilities, I hope this helps.
Answer:
the representative heuristic.
Explanation:
While confronted with confusion people often attempt to make a decision, by relying on a mental shortcut described as heuristic representatives. Heuristics are used we make quick decisions using past experiences. While these shortcuts may accelerate the process of decision making, it may also result in faulty choices and stereotypes. As per the question, Piper used heuristic to quickly judges the person.
<span>This is the trickle across theory. People in each social group tend to look at the "leaders" of their group as a way of determining what is fashionable, and then adjust their views accordingly. Leaders of each group are able to access these styles at various prices at about the same time.</span>
The Invalid argument form follows the following steps in its pattern of reasoning.
Explanation:
- The base idea is that something has to be TRUE for it to be a valuable possession.
- This is also known as the Argument from Validity or Necessity.
- What follows from this position is that anything not valued cannot be inherently good, or valuable.
- This invalid argument then concludes that all pursuits which are not valued by the speaker must contain some type of negativity inherent within them.
<h3>What is an invalid argument called?</h3>
The Invalid argument is a type of Fallacy that involves making an invalid claim. This can be done in two ways: The false dilemma and appeal to authority.
The false dilemma occurs when someone presents two options as if they are the only options, when in reality there are other possible choices.
For example, "Either you support gun control or you're against it."
This ignores the fact that people may have various positions on gun control based on their personal beliefs and experience with guns.
Appeal to authority occurs when we take what somebody else says as unquestionable truth without first verifying this information ourselves.
An example would be saying "Doctor Jones recommends X" without providing any evidence to support this claim.
To learn more about invalid argument, visit:
brainly.com/question/14456718
#SPJ4
Answer:
Rhetoric
Explanation:
Rhetoric aims to study the capacities of writers or speakers needed to inform, persuade, or motivate particualr audiensces in specific situations.
