Answer:
groupthink
Explanation:
Groupthink
Groupthink is a term that was first used in 1972 by social psychologist Irving L. Janis it refers to a psychological phenomenon in which people strive for agreement within the group. In many cases, people will set aside their own personal beliefs or adopt the opinion of the rest of the group.
People who are opposed to the decisions or overriding opinion of the group as a whole frequently remain quiet or non chalant , preferring to keep the peace rather than disrupt the uniformity of the crowd.
Answer:
Meditation
Explanation:
Annie and Bart are coworkers, they have to see each other every single day at work. They will have to speak to each other in the future regardless of their differences now. Treating one another with hostility is not good for the atmosphere at work and it may have a negative effect on their productivity level as well.
Because they are coworkers, a traditional lawsuit would not be advisable as it would create farther dispute and the company's name and reputation would suffer. Arbitration may work but again, this would take the dispute to another level of importance, thus not being good for the company.
Mediation keeps the dispute at friends' level which is what both Annie and Bart are. The accident was not serious and they should rise above their pride and try to work things out in a peaceful and not accusatory manner. This would also show the other coworkers and the director that they take their jobs seriously and are not prepare to risk them because of some personal matters.
Yes it has been reported that modern redlining is pushing Texans from their homes.
<h3>What is redlining?</h3>
This is a sort of discriminatory practice that is meted to the people that are thought to exist in areas that are bad for investments.
In Texas, the people are facing issues that have to do with increase in Tax payments and other forms of high cost of living. This is making it difficult for people to keep up.
Read more on redlining here:
brainly.com/question/14605669
#SPJ1
They opposed it because of the high casualty rate.
Answer:
In the landmark U.S. v. New York Times case, the Court ruled that the government could not, through "prior restraint," block publication of any material unless it could prove that it would "surely" result in "direct, immediate, and irreparable" harm to the nation.
