Answer: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks goes to God, the unconditional love and support of my wife, parents and extended family, my dissertation committee, Alex, the institutions of the United States of America, the State of South Carolina, the University of South Carolina, the Department of Political Science faculty and staff, the Walker Institute of International and Area Studies faculty and staff, the Center for Teaching Excellence, undergraduate political science majors at South Carolina who helped along the way, and the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict. This work was partially supported by a SPARC Graduate Research Grant from the Office of the Vice President for Research at the University of South Carolina and the Sueng Yeun Kim dissertation grant from the Center for Asian Studies at the Walker Institute. I would especially like to acknowledge approximately half of Earth’s population currently living under some form of non-democracy. This work is not intended to disparage you or your country or your culture in any way shape or form. This work is designed to 1) help foster understanding and cooperation between people that reside in democracies and those that live in dictatorships, 2) highlight nonviolent approaches to governance that can hopefully prevent some of the atrocities that tend to occur more often in dictatorships, and 3) move us further along in the quest for a universal understanding of good governance. Henry, remember that knowledge is one thing that no person and no government can ever take away from you. Acquire as much of it as you possibly can.
Explanation:
The correct answer is letter c. lobbyists. Representatives of interest groups that work to influence Congress are called lobbyists. Lobbyists are get paid to win favor from politicians. They are also <span>activists who seeks to persuade members of the government to enact a certain legislation.</span>
Answer:
It harmed animals. It harmed plants. It polluted water.
Explanation:
<u>Answer:
</u>
The research paper titled 'Incorporation of Environmental Factors in Stock Assessments: Just Because We Can, When Should We' was presented by multiple authors and co-authors at the 145th annual meeting of the American Fisheries Society held at Portland, Oregon in 2015.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The research paper talks about the attempts made by the Society at incorporating various environmental factors in the practices of fishing in order to move towards sustainability.
- It emphasizes the successes of these attempts and calls for more varied and in-depth incorporation of sustainable environmental practices by suggesting possible practices in the discipline.
- The success of practices like the development of sustainable mechanism has been highlighted in the paper.
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation:
