DNA sequencing is the technique which allows multiple peoples DNA to be compared to look for similarities and differences in order to solve crime and is denoted as option C.
<h3>What is DNA?</h3>
This is referred to as the deoxyribonucleic acid and contains the genetic components of organisms and is also located in the nucleus. On the other hand, DNA sequencing refers to the process of determining the nucleic acid sequence.
Each organisms has a unique DNA sequence which is why it is used to identify individuals through the use of bodily fluids such as saliva, blood etc.
It is used to compare the similarities and differences in order to solve crime thereby making it the most appropriate choice.
Read more about DNA sequencing here brainly.com/question/1243987
#SPJ1
Explanation:
The expression is :
A =[LT], B=[L²T⁻¹], C=[LT²]
Using dimensional of A, B and C in above formula. So,
![A=B^nC^m\\\\\ [LT]=[L^2T^{-1}]^n[LT^2}]^m\\\\\ [LT]=L^{2n}T^{-n}L^mT^{2m}\\\\\ [LT]=L^{2n+m}T^{2m-n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=A%3DB%5EnC%5Em%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5BLT%5D%3D%5BL%5E2T%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5En%5BLT%5E2%7D%5D%5Em%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5BLT%5D%3DL%5E%7B2n%7DT%5E%7B-n%7DL%5EmT%5E%7B2m%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5BLT%5D%3DL%5E%7B2n%2Bm%7DT%5E%7B2m-n%7D)
Comparing the powers both sides,
2n+m=1 ...(1)
2m-n=1 ...(2)
Now, solving equation (1) and (2) we get :
Hence, the correct option is (E).
The vertical force exerted on the lawn is 68.8 N downward
Explanation:
The vertical force exerted by the lawnmower on the lawn is equal to the vertical component of the force applied, therefore:
where
F is the magnitude of the force applied
is the angle between the direction of the force and the horizontal
In this problem:
F = 120 N
Substituting,
where the negative sign means the direction of the force is downward.
Learn more about vector components and forces here:
brainly.com/question/2678571
brainly.com/question/8459017
brainly.com/question/11292757
brainly.com/question/12978926
#LearnwithBrainly
It is indeed true that scientists have known about the background radiation (commonly known as the Cosmic Microwave Background) since the early 60s. It was first discovered quite by accident by Penzias and Wilson working at Bell Labs, who detected it as an unexplainable interference in their precision radio equipment. When people finally figured out exactly what it was they were seeing, they won the Nobel Prize for their discovery. Only a few years before, George Gamow had predicted that if the Big Bang theory were correct, we should observe just such a background radiation. The CMB is not the only evidence in favor of the Big Bang, but it is one of the most important. It is a natural consequence of the theory, and is pretty unexplainable in steady-state cosmology.
The 15-20 billion year number comes not from the CMB, but rather predominantly from measurements of nearby and distant galaxies, particularly their rates of expansion away from us. We find that the distance to a galaxy is proportional to its recessional velocity. The constant of proportionality is the Hubble Constant, H, which turns out to be (approximately) the reciprocal of the age of the universe. So we measure the age by measuring recessional velocities. T = 1/H is only true, however, if the universe is not significantly accelerating or decelerating its expansion rate. If the rate of expansion is rapidly accelerating, the universe may be older than 1/H = 15 billion years, give or take. Such an acceleration would be caused by a large value of the Cosmological Constant, a sort of anti-gravity force predicted by General Relativity. There is some evidence that this might be the case.
So finally, yes, the age of the universe, being based on the empirical determination of H, is based on the observed evidence.
It is incorrect, because the identity of the original product has changed. Ca3(OH)2 does not exist! It is no longer calcium hydroxide. To balance an equation, you must manipulate the coefficients, a.k.a. the big numbers that go before reactants or products. Subscripts, the little numbers inside the reactants or products, cannot be changed without completely changing the substance.
