Answer: 2.93 ft/sec
Explanation: Calculate the volume/sec entering from the two inlets (Pipes 1 and 2), add them, and then calculate the flow in Pipe 3.
The table illustrates the approach. I calculated the volume of each pipe for a 1 foot section with the indicated diameters, divided by 2 for the radius of each using V = πr²h. Units of V are in^3/foot length. Now we can multiply that volume by the flow rate, in ft/sec, to obtain the flow rate in in^3/sec.
Add the two rates from Pipes 1 and 2 (62.14 in^3/sec) to arrive at the flow rate for Pipe 3 necessary to keep the water level constant. Calculate the volume of 1 foot of Pipe 3 (21.21 in^3/foot) and then divide this into the inflow sum of 62.14 in^3/sec to find the flow rate of Pipe 3 (in feet/sec) necessary to keep the water level constant.
That is 2.93 ft/sec.
Answer:
potato<-100
print(potato)
sqrt(potato)
potato<-potato*2
print(potato)
Explanation:
The complete question is as follows
Create a variable called potato whose value corresponds to the number of potatoes you’ve eaten in the last week. Or something equally ridiculous. Print out the value of potato.
Calculate the square root of potato using the sqrt() function. Print out the value of potato again to verify that the value of potato hasn’t changed.
Reassign the value of potato to potato * 2.
Print out the new value of potato to verify that it has changed
The question was answered using R programming language.
At line 1, I assumed that I ate 100 potatoes in the previous week.
So, potato = 100
At line 2, the value of potato is printed as 100.
At line 3, the square root of potato is calculated using sqrt function: Square for of 100 = 10
At line 4,the initial value of potato is doubled and stored in potato variable. 100 * 2 = 200
At line 5, the new value of potato is printed: 200.
Answer:
you get electrocuted...........
Answer:
inductive reasoning
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is one of the type of reasoning method in which generalized consequences are derived from limited observations. By observing few data, general conclusions are drawn. The conclusions drawn are false in inductive reasoning. In the given situation, the conclusion drawn by the elevator repairer has been drawn by inductive reasoning. His observation of some cables led him to draw the conclusion about all the cables. The result of the reasoning is false.
