For severe crimes, like taking a life of a human being, yes. I think it would in that case.
But I don't think it should be a penalty to such a large punishment such as a death penalty, because what if the criminal did something minor, like stealing from a small candy store or something like that? Would you really give that kind of person a punishment such as death, which the victim cannot redo life and try to improve as a better person?
I think the death penalty should be used for people who are long gone in mind and cannot come back, if you would know what I mean (people who don't feel regret for something like murder and such). In my opinion, that is! :)
Thanks,
-xxred24
To say that the population of the US is heterogeneous is to say that the population is diverse population.
Answer:
The colonies had British governors in place but many also had assemblies to represent the interests of the people. During the 1600's, the colonies were mostly left alone to monitor themselves and this remained as long as the economic relationship was good.
Virginia created the House of Burgesses which was the first representative government in the colonies. Landowners were the government officials and people responsible for running the colonial governments. New England colonies were represented by a council of elders and church leaders. They also agreed to a representative colonial government in which landowning men were the only people involved in the government.
Answer:
D. set of instruction for a math test
Explanation:
all the others are an example
Answer:
That all slaves were free!
Explanation:
