You only need to replace the value of x in the function rule. You'll get:
30. you can model this with an equation and solve, x being the smallest number and the x+1 and x+2 representing the consecutive numbers.
x+(x+1)+(x+2)=93
3x+3=93
3x=90
x=30
x+1=31
x+2=32
30+31+32=93
Answer:
180/60
1 hour is 60 min and 3 times 60 is 180.
So it’s 180/60
Also 180/60 is 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Answer:
what I think this question has mistake