Answer:
50% of the offspring is expected to be heterozygous for hair length.
Explanation:
50% of the offspring is expected to be heterozygous for hair length.
Heterozygous short hair (Hh)
Long hair cat (hh)
When both of them are crossed they produces offspring with genes:
Hh, Hh, hh, and hh
Hh - Heterozygous short hair
hh- dominant long hair.
So we can infer that 50% of the offspring (2 out of 4) is expected to be heterozygous for hair length, which is heterozygous short hair.
On September 24, 622, the prophet Muhammad completes his Hegira, or “flight,” from Mecca to Medina to escape persecution. In Medina, Muhammad set about building the followers of his religion—Islam—into an organized community and Arabian power.
Answer: The correct answer is : The myth is that a greater number of birth defects would be caused.
Explanation: Nancy Thornhill conducted a sample study of 129 societies where she discovered that the most common incest taboo was among cousins. Massachusetts Governor Briggs delegated a commission to study "idiots" in the state and one of the factors responsible for idiocy is cousin marriage, also a study between deaf and mute in Kentucky yielded the same results, adding blindness.
Answer: The correct answer is "A/nal".
Explanation:
In psychoanalysis, a fixation in the a/nal stage refers to a personality that is not fully developed. Usually A/nally fixated adults are people that are extremely organized, tidy, punctual and doesn't like improvising, which in turn causes them high levels of stress and anxiety.
<u>In this particular case, Shaunquelle is an adult who requieres regularity in all aspects of her life. She organizes her clothes by season, she becomes distressed by minor things, she eats the same lunch everyday which shows that Shaunquelle appears to be fixated at the a/nal stage of psycho-sexual development.</u>
<u>In conclusion, the answer is A/nal.</u>
Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
