Hello! The most practical solution would be to build pedestrian-friendly walkways.
First, you can eliminate C (increasing taxes) because it would mean less people would be able to afford medical treatment or visiting a doctor.
Now, we can eliminate choice A. Purchasing a bicycle for each household would not be practical because it would be costly and increase taxes. Plus, the money could be going to more beneficial uses.
At first, D sounds reasonable, however, not only would it would increase taxes, it wouldn't be practical because many senior citizens have joint problems and the intense exercise equipment found at gyms would not best suit them.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer: YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Explanation:
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
it can get addicting and you can have side effects
"Fat-free products typically have so much added sugar that the k calorie count can be as high as in the regular-fat product" would be an appropriate analysis of Jenny’s decision.
<u>Option: D</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The inspiration for developing low-fat foods can be attributed to the McGovern Committee which released a 1977 report proposing that Americans consume less fat and more complicated carbohydrates to avoid diabetes, cardiovascular disease.
Several health organizations have repeated the same guidelines in the following decades, potentially leading to America's current addiction to junk foods. Fat-free products have high sugar, which become just a formality at the end to be on true diet, because these sugar form is fructose with excess levels and associated with an hiked risk of obesity, high blood pressure, kidney disease, type 2 diabetes and other health issues.
