The correct statement is that Nuremberg Trials established the principle that individuals are accountable for their actions even during time of war. So, the correct option is B.
Nuremberg trials did a research analysis which was concluded by saying that the individual will be responsible for the consequences of his/her actions during war situations.
<h3>Nuremberg Trials </h3>
The Nuremberg Trials were held as a series of 13 studies that were conducted in the Nuremberg city upon the orders of Adolf Hitler in the years 1945.
This conclusive result of these trials was that a nation is not capable of giving attention to individuals as an emergency situation has struck the nation.
As a result, neither the national government nor any leader will be responsible for the actions of an individual during a war crisis.
Hence, the correct option is B that Nuremberg Trials established the principle that individuals are accountable for their actions even during time of war.
Learn more about Nuremberg Trials here:
brainly.com/question/1184542
Answer:
Details which support the Aryans' and Indians' use of the caste system are that Aryans were the superior race under the Third Reich. They were superior in terms of technology and science, so their use of a caste system was entirely justified. Heinrich Himmler designed this caste system to be as efficient as possible. As far as the Indian caste system, native Americans have been casting pottery since the dawn of time, so it makes sense that they would have a caste system to support their society. Can you imagine making friendship pipes without a system in place? It is for those reasons that the Aryans' and Indians' caste systems were used and I fully support that use.
Explanation:
Answer: D
Explanation:
His final solution was to always kill of the Jewish people in Europe.
Answer:
answer below!
Explanation: The 40 Principal Doctrines of the Epicureans taught that "in order to obtain protection from other men, any means for attaining this end is a natural good" (PD 6). They believed in a contractarian ethics where mortals agree to not harm or be harmed, and the rules that govern their agreements are not absolute (PD 33), but must change with circumstances (PD 37-38). The Epicurean doctrines imply that humans in their natural state enjoy personal sovereignty and that they must consent to the laws that govern them, and that this consent (and the laws) can be revisited periodically when circumstances change.[11]
The Stoics held that no one was a slave by nature; slavery was an external condition juxtaposed to the internal freedom of the soul (sui juris). Seneca the Younger wrote:
It is a mistake to imagine that slavery pervades a man's whole being; the better part of him is exempt from it: the body indeed is subjected and in the power of a master, but the mind is independent, and indeed is so free and wild, that it cannot be restrained even by this prison of the body, wherein it is confined.[12]
Of fundamental importance to the development of the idea of natural rights was the emergence of the idea of natural human equality. As the historian A.J. Carlyle notes: "There is no change in political theory so startling in its completeness as the change from the theory of Aristotle to the later philosophical view represented by Cicero and Seneca.... We think that this cannot be better exemplified than with regard to the theory of the equality of human nature."[13] Charles H. McIlwain likewise observes that "the idea of the equality of men is the profoundest contribution of the Stoics to political thought" and that "its greatest influence is in the changed conception of law that in part resulted from it."[14] Cicero argues in De Legibus that "we are born for Justice, and that right is based, not upon opinions, but upon Nature.
The Korean War was the first militarized instance of containment, as U.S. and South Korea fought against communist North Korea. ... When the UN Security Council voted to aid South Korea in stopping North Korean aggression, the U.S. agreed to send troops to the Korean Peninsula.
