Answer:
The equation to represent the rate of receding water level is L = 34 .
Step-by-step explanation:
Given as :
The initial level of water in river = 34 feet
The rate of receding water level = 0.5 foot per day
Or, The rate of percentage of receding water level = 50 % per day
Let the level of water after d days = L
Now,
The level of water after d days = initial level of water × (
I.e L = 34 × (
∴ L = 34 ×
Hence The equation to represent the rate of receding water level is L = 34 . Answer
Step-by-step explanation:
A is correct option there are no real roots
because discriminant is less than zero
Answer:
1308/12=109
Step-by-step explanation:
each payment is 109 dollars
i just divided 1308 by 12 and got 109
Answer:
In order to test the hypothesis if the correlation coefficient it's significant we have the following hypothesis:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:
And is distributed with n-2 degreed of freedom. df=n-2=10-2=8
For this case the null hypothesis represent that we don't have association betwen the dependent variable Y and the independent variable X and that means r=0. So then the best option for this case is:
The null hypothesis for the Pearson correlation coefficient states that the correlation coefficient is zero
Step-by-step explanation:
Previous concepts
The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:
Solution to the problem
In order to test the hypothesis if the correlation coefficient it's significant we have the following hypothesis:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic to check the hypothesis is given by:
And is distributed with n-2 degreed of freedom. df=n-2=10-2=8
For this case the null hypothesis represent that we don't have association betwen the dependent variable Y and the independent variable X and that means r=0. So then the best option for this case is:
The null hypothesis for the Pearson correlation coefficient states that the correlation coefficient is zero