Shrink nations work force
Answer & Explanation:
<u>a.- Revenues: </u>Increase for 3.2 millions
It will be recognize for the entire order, as it was deliveried entirely within the accounting period.
<u>b.- Earnings: </u> Increase for 1.5 millions
The earnings for the business will be the net between the revenues and expenses.
3.2 revenues - 1.7 expenses = 1.5 earnings
<u>c.- Receivables: </u> Increase for 1.8 millions
It will increase for the unpaid portion ofthe order.
<u>d.- Inventory</u> Decrease for 1.7 millions
It will decrease for the entire cost of the order, as it was within this accounting period both, revenues and the expense related to it, will be recognize.
<u>e.- Cash:</u> Increase for 1.4 millions
It will increase for the amount received from the customer. As it was no payment from the business in the transaction.
Answer:
B) a monopolist's demand curve is the same as the market demand curve
Explanation:
The demand curve is downward sloping for both monopolies and competitive markets. Rational consumers will always buy larger quantities of products or services when their prices are lower, and inversely will buy less when the price if higher. This applies to all types of markets except monopsonies (a lot of suppliers and only one consumer).
$12120 is the annual amortization expense
<u>Explanation:</u>
The following formula is used to calculate the annual depreciation expense that will be recorded in the books of accounts
Depreciation = ( cost of the asset minus salvage value) divide by number of years.
Given data in the question: number of years = 10, cost of the asset = $124000, salvage value = $28000
Putting the figures in the formula,
Depreciation expense = ($124000 minus $28000) divide by 10
After solving, we get = $12120
Thus, annual depreciation expense = $12120
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
