<h2>ANSWER:</h2><h2 /><h2>
<u>1</u><u>6</u><u>,</u><u>0</u><u>0</u><u>0</u></h2>
<h2>
<u>EXPLA</u><u>NATION</u><u>:</u></h2>
<u>3</u><u>0</u><u>0</u><u>+</u><u>5</u><u>%</u><u>+</u><u>2</u><u>YEARS</u><u>=</u><u>1</u><u>6</u><u>,</u><u>0</u><u>0</u><u>0</u>
<u>HOPE</u><u> IT</u><u> HELPS</u><u> YOU</u>
<u>CAN</u><u> </u><u>YOU</u><u> BRAINLEST</u><u> ME</u>
Answer:
Put them all in your calculator and it will show you which is correct
Answer:
x=-2.5 if the function is
Step-by-step explanation:
has discontinuities when the denominator is 0.
You will either have a hole or a vertical asymptote depending on what happens to the numerator after you find when the bottom is 0.
That is whatever you found that makes the bottom 0, if it makes the top also 0 then you will have a hole at x=the number that made the bottom 0.
If it makes the top anything other than 0, then it is a vertical asymptote at x=the number you found that made the bottom 0.
Let's do this now.
When is -4x-10 equal to 0?
We have to solve the equation:
-4x-10=0
Add 10 on both sides:
-4x=10
Divide both sides by -4:
x=10/-4
Reduce by dividing top and bottom by 2:
x=5/-2
x=-5/2
or
x=-2.5 (if you want decimal form)
Now does it make the top 0? This is the deciding factor on whether you have a hole at x=-2.5 or a vertical asymptote at x=-2.5.
Let's see.
8(-2.5)-3=-23
Since the top is not 0 at x=-2.5 then you have a vertical asymptote at x=-2.5.
If the top were 0, then you would have had a hole at x=-2.5.
I think it would be 195 or it might be 195 or it might be 195 or it might be 195
Answer:
Randomized block design
Step-by-step explanation:
In the scenario described above, the subjects which are the different car types are grouped into fixed units of 4 called blocks with each unit then assigned randomly to a particular treatment condition, which are the 4 different types of tire. In the end, the mean mileage for each block is taken and compared to that of the other blocks. This type of research design improves the reliability of the result obtained as it also eliminates the occurrence of systematic error in the course of our experiment.