Relevant, you don't want information that has nothing to do w to your topic
<u>Full question:</u>
You know that firm XYZ is very poorly run. On a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best), you would give it a score of 3. The market consensus evaluation is that the management score is only 2. Should you buy or sell the stock?
A. Buy
B. Sell
<u>Answer:</u>
Buy the stock
<u>Explanation:</u>
At any position in time, the stock price displays all candidly accessible erudition about the company. This implies that an investor can obtain abnormal returns only if that investor holds private erudition about the firm's forecasts.
The firm's administration is not as critical as everyone else considers it to be, hence, the firm is underestimated by the market. You are scarcely hopeless about the firm's probabilities than the assumptions constructed into the stock price. As the administration of the firm is not as weak as anticipated to be. So the investor will determine to buy the stocks of the firm.
Answer: To prescribe enough policies to give organizational members clear direction and to place desirable boundaries on their actions, then empower them to act within these boundaries however they think makes sense.
Explanation:
A useful guideline in designing strategy-facilitating policies and operating procedures is: to prescribe enough policies to give organizational members clear direction in implementing strategy and to place reasonable boundaries on their actions, then empower them to act within these boundaries however they think makes sense.
<span>Durable goods and non-durable goods comprise approximately 45% of the supply side of the GDP. If the government reduces the taxes o the companies and the industries then their production will likely increase and which may will lead to the reduce in the price level s when it reaches the consumers, this is called the supply side economics.</span>
I think its A cuz its about good or bad credit all the time
