All categories

2 years ago

PLEASE HELP FAST,I NEED THIS BADLY

Mathematics

1 answer:

Simora [160]2 years ago

5 0

DE~JK the only two side lengths you know, so it is the only possible answer.

You might be interested in

Why is #2 the expression ln(2e)^3x equivalent to choice B?

motikmotik

Hello:
ln(2e^3x) =ln2+lne^3x
 =ln2 +3xlne
= ln2+3x .....lne=1
choice B

8 0

2 years ago

Explain how you can find 4 times 754 using two different methods.

ludmilkaskok [199]

Method 1:

4(754)

=4(700+50+4)

=2800 + 200 + 16

=3000+16

=3016

-----------------

Method 2:

4(754)

=4(250+250+250+4)

=1000+1000+1000+16

=3016

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The product of a number and 5

steposvetlana [31]

Pretty sure it would be 5x u less theres more to the problem

4 0

2 years ago

Multiply. Write your answer in simplest form. -√2(-2+√5)

vova2212 [387]

Step-by-step explanation:

this is all I can find I hope it helps you out us not I'm sorry

7 0

2 years ago

The USDA conducted tests for salmonella in produce grown in California. In an independent sample of 252 cultures obtained from w

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 252$

The number that tested positive is $k_1 = 18$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 476$

The number that tested positive is $k_2 = 20$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.01$

Generally the first sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _1 = \frac{k_1 }{ n_1 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = \frac{18 }{ 252 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = 0.071$

Generally the second sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _2 = \frac{k_2 }{ n_2 }$

=> $\^ p _2 = \frac{20 }{ 476}$

=> $\^ p _2 = 0.042$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 - p_2 = 0$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 - p_2 \ne 0$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented

$z = \frac{ \^ p_1 - \^ p_2 - ( p_ 1 - p_2 )}{ \sqrt{\frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^ p_1)}{ n_1 } + \frac{\^ p_2 (1-\^ p_2)}{ n_2 } } }$

=> $z = \frac{ 0.071 - 0.042 - 0 }{ \sqrt{\frac{0.071 (1-0.071)}{ 252 } + \frac{0.042 (1-\^ 0.042)}{ 476 } } }$

=> $z = 1.56$

From the z table the area under the normal curve to the right corresponding to 1.56 is

$P(Z > 1.56 ) =0.05938$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 * P(Z > 1.56 )$

=> $p-value = 2 * 0.05938$

=> $p-value = 0.1188$

From the value obtained we see that $p-value > \alpha$ hence

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

5 0

2 years ago