What is the contrapositive of the statement below?
2 answers:
You might be interested in
The correct option A: graph A, shows the logarithmic function;
f(x) = log₃x + 1
<h3>Explain the term logarithmic function?</h3>- The opposite of such an exponential function is a logarithmic function.
- A log function and then an exponential function both use the same base.
- An exponent is a logarithm. f(x) = bx is how the exponential function be expressed.
- The formula again for logarithmic function is f(x) = log base b of x.
f(x) = log₃x + 1
- When x = 1
f(1) = log₃1 + 1
f(1) = 0 + 1
f(1) = 1
(1, 1)
- When x = 3
f(3) = log₃3 + 1
f(3) = 1 + 1
f(3) = 2
(3, 2)
Thus, the graph must contain the points (1, 1), (3, 2).
Therefore, graph A define the given logarithmic function;
f(x) = log₃x + 1.
To know more about the logarithmic function, here
#SPJ4
Answer:
for
, with
.
Step-by-step explanation:
To obtain x-intercepts, we need to give certain value, specifically .
However, in case of a rational function, we must make sure that doesn't makes the denominator null, beacuse in that case the function is undefined.
Therefore, for x-intercepts we must say
for
, with
.