What is the direction of translation for<br> (x, y) + (x,y+6) ?

-4.3 g equals 25.8 solve for G

iren2701 [21]

-4.3g = 25.8
/-4.3 on both sides
g = -6

Answer:
g = -6

7 0

3 years ago

Question 10

KonstantinChe [14]

Answer:

area of the trapezoid=1/2(7+12)×5

=47.5cm

7 0

3 years ago

You buy books for 64 cents each, you plan to sell them for 75 cents each. You're left with 100 unsold books, and you lost $12. H

PSYCHO15rus [73]

The number of books sold is 473.

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

The original cost of each book = $0.64
The selling price of each book = $0.75

The difference between the original price and selling price of the book gives the profit per book.

The profit of one book = Selling price - Original price

Let,

The total number of books be 'x'.
The number of books sold be 'y'.
The unsold books is 100.
The total profit is -12 because it was gone to a loss of $12.

Therefore, the equation is formed as

total Profit = 0.75y - 0.64x

⇒ 0.75y - 0.64x = -12 --------(1)

Total books = sold books + unsold books

x = y + 100

⇒ x-y = 100 -------(2)

Substitute x= 100+y in the eq(1),

0.75y - 0.64(100+y) = -12

0.75y - 64 -0.64y = -12

0.11y = -12 +64

y = 52 / 0.11

y = 472.7

y ≅ 473

The number of book sold is 473 books.

The total number of books is (100+473) = 573 books.

8 0

3 years ago

Aubrey claims that if the dimensions of the parallelogram shown are doubled, then the area of the larger parallelogram will be 4

Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Aubrey is correct because the area of the new parallelogram is 12 (6) = 72 square inches. The original area is 18 square inches. Since 4 (18) = 72, the new parallelogram has 4 times the area of the original.

Step-by-step explanation:

A parallelogram with a base of 6 inches and height of 3 inches. A side has a length of 5 inches.

Aubrey is correct because the area of the new parallelogram is 12 (6) = 72 square inches. The original area is 18 square inches. Since 4 (18) = 72, the new parallelogram has 4 times the area of the original.

Aubrey is correct because the area of the new parallelogram is 10 (7) = 70 square inches. The original area is 18 square inches. Since 4 (18) = 72, it is about 4 times larger than the original.

Aubrey is incorrect because if one doubles each dimension, then the area will automatically be doubled as well. The original area is 18 square inches so the new parallelogram will have an area of 2 (18) = 36, or two times more than the original.

Aubrey is incorrect because if one doubles each dimension, then the area will automatically be doubled as well. The original area is 30 square inches so the new parallelogram will have an area of 2 (30) = 60, or 2 times more than the original.

Workings

Area of a parallelogram=base×height

Original parallelogram

Base=6 inches

Height=3 inches

Area=base×height

=6×3

=18 square inches

New parallelogram with doubled dimensions

Base=6 inches doubled=12 inches

Height=3 inches doubled=6 inches

Area=base×height

=12×6

=72 square inches

New area=4 times original area

New area=4×18

New area=72 square inches

5 0

3 years ago

] It is claimed that 42% of US college graduates had a mentor in college. For a sample of college graduates in Colorado, it was

Bad White [126]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.480 -0.42}{\sqrt{\frac{0.42(1-0.42)}{1045}}}=3.930$

The p value for this case would be given by:

$p_v =P(z>3.930)=0.0000443$

For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis so then we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.42

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=1045 represent the random sample selected

X=502 represent the college graduates with a mentor

$\hat p=\frac{502}{1045}=0.480$ estimated proportion of college graduates with a mentor

$p_o=0.42$ is the value that we want to test

z would represent the statistic

$p_v$ represent the p value

Hypothesis to test

We want to test if the true proportion is higher than 0.42, the system of hypothesis are.:

Null hypothesis: $p \leq 0.42$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.42$

The statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

Replacing the info we got:

$z=\frac{0.480 -0.42}{\sqrt{\frac{0.42(1-0.42)}{1045}}}=3.930$

The p value for this case would be given by:

$p_v =P(z>3.930)=0.0000443$

For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis so then we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.42

7 0

3 years ago

What is the direction of translation for (x, y) + (x,y+6) ?