1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Law Incorporation [45]
2 years ago
15

Find the formula please

Mathematics
2 answers:
Serggg [28]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

well I'm sorry I don't know the answer maybe John knows the answer

MatroZZZ [7]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

check the image for the complete step by step answer

You might be interested in
I’ll give you all my love and affection if you help me with this ASAP PLEASE ;)
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

(0,12)

Step-by-step explanation:

Plug 0 into y

7 0
3 years ago
Will Mark Brainlest helppp plss​
Dima020 [189]

Answer:

the required value of c is [ -11 -1

2 5]

3 0
2 years ago
Zahra has paper rectangles of different sizes. Every rectangle is 5 centimeters longer than it is wide. Is there a proportional
Alika [10]

Answer: The answer is NO. Explained below.


Step-by-step explanation:  Given that Zahra has a number of rectangles of different sizes which are made of paper. Also, the length of every rectangle is 5 cm more than its breadth.

We are to find whether the relationship between lengths and breadths of rectangles is proportional or not.

Let,  'l' represents the length and 'b' represents the breadth of any of these rectangles, then according to the given information, we can write

l = b + 5.

For a proportional relationship, we need a relation of the form

l = k × b, which is not always possible in the given case.

For example, if l = 8, b = 3, and l=9, b=4 then we cannot write

l = k × b, for a constant k.

Hence there is no proportional relationship  between the lengths and widths of these rectangles.

Thus, the answer is NO. Hence explained.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you put this numred in word form 3,152,308,
earnstyle [38]
Three-million, one hundred five-hundred fifty-two thousand, three hundred and eight.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
F it costs $90 to feed a family of 3 for one week. (3 points)
Nataly [62]
Given:
$90 good for 3 pax for 1 week.

a) $90 / 3 = $30 cost to feed each person in a week
b) $30 cost to feed each person * 5 persons = $150
c) $30 cost to feed each person * 6 persons in a family = $180 

The formula derived from the above facts is:

Total cost = cost per person * no. of person * no. of weeks.

Assuming = 6 persons for 2 weeks
Total cost = 30 x 6 x 2
Total cost = 180 x 2
Total cost = 360 cost to feed a family of 6 in 2 weeks.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is three tenths times 8
    13·1 answer
  • An electric sale gives a reading equal to the true weight plus a random error that isnormally distributed with mean 0 and standa
    7·1 answer
  • A composition of reflections over parallel lines is the same as a __________. A. translation B. rotation C. glide reflection D.
    6·2 answers
  • Keisha estimates 259+372 by rounding each number to the nearest 10. What is Keisha's estimate of the sum?
    10·1 answer
  • Which rectangle is similar to a rectangle 12 inches wide and 18 inches long
    6·1 answer
  • The quality control manager at a bakery is inspecting a batch of 100 chocolate chip cookies. If the production process is in con
    15·1 answer
  • Each season a school basketball team plays 3 practice games and then plays 2 regular seasons games against each of x teams. Whic
    11·1 answer
  • Need help!!! will mark brainliest!!!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Please show work, i’ll mark as brainliest
    13·2 answers
  • Calculus - need work shown
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!