Answer: The answer should be 0.125
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Let's solve for x, writing this equation.
3x +8*59 =0
3x +472=0 <em>Subtract 472 from both sides</em>
3x = -472
x= -472/3 or -157.33
2) So the answer is x= -472/3
No, it is an imaginary number.
Can't take the square root of a negative number without creating a method termed an imaginary number, which is the square root of -1 which they have used " i " to signify.
Then square root of -11.2 would be written Sqrt(11.2)i. The Sqrt(11.2) = 3.3466
so the answer is 3.3466i
There both types of numbers but a whole number is a number with no exponents or decimals, but decimals are like a broken un half whole number
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
