Answer:
Manolo: Hello ... Irene, isn't it?
Irene: Yes. I'm Irene, okay?
MAnolo: Alright. I'm Manolo.
Irene: I hope I wasn't late.
Manolo: What time is it?
Irene: 2 pm.
Manolo: You arrived just in time.
Irene: What course do you take?
Manolo: I study history and philosophy and you?
Irene: English literature.
Manolo: Can we start the research?
Irene: Yes, we can. I believe that we can find suitable books in the third hall. Should we go?
Manolo: Sure.
Explanation:
The dialogue was made with basic questions between two people who were meeting and needed to do academic work together. As they were in a library, I believe that the execution of some academic research between the two is the most appropriate subject to establish this dialogue.
The actions that Susan made are clearly an irruption to someone’s privacy. With that said, basically, Susan is a person whose abilities allow her to meddle into someone’s business without their permission. This is what people usually call as “privacy violation” since the person who is stealing someone’s information is doing it without them to know.
Hacking is a very common activity nowadays. There are some apps and tools that facilitate this kind of task,s for hackers. Sometimes they have their own hacking software but it is pretty common to do it throughout programming.
The problem with this kind of activities is that it is a moral dilemma since it is a cybernetic felony that send people to jail and sometimes they also have to pay a bail in order to not to go to prison if they are discovered and caught. In the worst scenery, people that commit this type of crimes, are both convicted and forced to pay the bail.
Most of the time, people or enterprises are hacked because their system is very vulnerable so that makes it really easy to hack. This is one of the reasons for the new type of security that is being implemented in people’s computers in order to avoid this type of misfortunes that currently affect many people around the world.
To summarize, Susan’s occupation can be described as a chain of risky activities that she has to do in order to avoid being discovered by the person she attacked; so that, she always must be very careful to not let any trace behind her actions.
Answer:
(D) Congress would not interfere in Hawaiian affairs
Explanation:
This question is a multiple-choice question for an article about the annexation of Hawaii by the United States. The question refers to this paragraph:
<em>Meanwhile, the provisional government had elected its first President. This President, President Dole, refused to give the government back to the Queen. Dole’s new government created a new constitution and declared Hawaii an independent Republic. Other countries began to recognize the new republic. Congress voted to adopt a hands-off policy towards Hawaii. </em>
A hands-off policy, in this case, means that Congress of the United States won't get involved in the new Hawaii Republic. The republic itself was made by the government established by Americans who previously were in Hawaii to conduct business and is in favor of overthrowing the previous monarch, Queen Liliuokalani.
The members of the community can apply for release. Which is a euphemism for death by lethal injection.
Answer:
the representative heuristic.
Explanation:
While confronted with confusion people often attempt to make a decision, by relying on a mental shortcut described as heuristic representatives. Heuristics are used we make quick decisions using past experiences. While these shortcuts may accelerate the process of decision making, it may also result in faulty choices and stereotypes. As per the question, Piper used heuristic to quickly judges the person.
