Answer:
We cannot agree with Andre because x = 3.
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the diagram is a weighing scale which can also be represented as an equation having two sides that is balanced. We can express the situation as follows using equation:
x + 2 = 5
Solve for x
x + 2 - 2 = 5 - 2 (subtraction property of equality)
x = 3
If you plug in the value of x on the diagram given, the scale becomes balance on each side.
Therefore, x = 3. Andre is wrong and we cannot agree with Andre.
Answer:

For this case the reliability of the sytem would be given by:

R1= 0.95, R2 =0.95, R3= 0.5, R4 = 0.79 , R5 = 0.6
And replacing we got:

Step-by-step explanation:
We can assume that the system work in series
If we have in general n units the reliability of the system is the probability that unit 1 succeeds and unit 2 succeeds and all of the other units in the system succeed. fror n units must succeed for the system to succeed. The reliability of the system is then given by:

For this case the reliability of the sytem would be given by:

R1= 0.95, R2 =0.95, R3= 0.5, R4 = 0.79 , R5 = 0.6
And replacing we got:

The value of g(−2) is smaller than the value of g(4).
The answer is Negative -62
Answer:
idk
Step-by-step explanation:
im such a big help