Answer:
The correct answer is E. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act is a major pieace of legislation affecting the financial industry and containing significant privacy provisions for individuals.
Explanation:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), also known as the Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999, is a US law that repealed the provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 that provided for the separation between traditional banking and investment banking, without to alter the provisions concerning the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The law was proposed to the Senate by Phil Gramm and to the Chamber Jim Leach and Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. It was signed by President Bill Clinton on November 12th 1999.
Answer:The Espionage Act
Explanation:
Snowden was sued for theft of government property and violation of section 793(d) and 798(a)(3) of the ESPIONAGE ACT.
The crime under these sections carry possible sentence of 30 years imprisonment. He can not be charged the crime of TREASON since it(treason) requires individual(s) waging war against the United States or a act of aiding United States' enemies.
The word 'Espionage' means the practice of spying to get information about the activities of foreign government(s).
Section 798(a)(3) forbids intentionally communication of confidential files to an unauthorized individual(s). The United States Supreme Court recognize the fact that employees of the government working with National security are in a POSITION OF TRUST that LIMITS THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT to DISCLOSE INFORMATION.
1. Accord and satisfaction
That’s the only one I will answer but I hoped it helped a little
This is based on who is telling the truth. The defendant denys being in the city at the time of the murder, but then a local newspaper states that he heard gunshots from inside his apartment the day of the murder (which would be impossible if he wasn't in the city at the same of the murder). There could also be a chance that the newspaper could be lying mainly because the defendant objected that the evidence was correct. In this case, the judge should take this into consideration especially when a local newpaper article announced that the defendant heard gunshots after saying that he was never in the city. So I would say, the newspaper article could be evidence to prove that the defendant is responsible for the murder.
