<em>Ans</em><em>:</em><em>-</em>
Explanation:
- limited, because not everyone serves in parliament
- limited, because citizens have a say over who serves in government***
- unlimited, because citizens do not pick the prime minister
- unlimited, because everyone has the right to vote
This really depends on your beliefs in if gender discrimination is as big of a deal as racial discrimination. The 14th amendment is the Equal Protection Clause, it was mainly for the slaves that had been freed in the U.S after the civil war. It basically forbids the states to restrict basic rights of citizens without going through the process of law or being protected by the law. But has recently been used in cases to of gender discrimination.
I believe it is perfectly justified for the 14th amendment to be acted in cases of gender discrimination. The 14th amendment does not have to be dedicated completely to race, but can have multiple purposes and be dedicated to gender discrimination as well. Because the 14th amendment does not mention race in its context, but mentions that basic rights shall not be stripped from citizens.
Answer:
2 pm
Explanation:
Atlanta Georiga is in the Eastern Time range, And the Eastern time is 3 hours ahead of Pacific time
"In his opinion it is morally wrong for any <span>political movement to use violence to achieve its goals. Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones." This implies that he is basing his answer off his morals and opinions rather than using solely historical facts and examples to support his argument</span>
