Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Both have the right to own property, bear arms, and freedom of religion
Answer:
WWII hadn’t happened yet.
Explanation:
It’s still called the Great War in some parts of Europe but back then it was easily the largest war to ever take place in human history.
The answers are "decrease" and "increase". Punishments is the cause of the “decreasing” frequency of
the behavior they follow, while negative reinforcers, while negative
reinforcers “increases” the frequency of the behavior that is being followed.
Negative reinforcement is a response or behavior that is being reinforced by discontinuing,
eliminating, or evading an undesirable result or aversive inducement.
