This is true. An intervention based on cognitive-behavioral principles will teach the client to recognize the content and impact of their cognitions (thoughts) and schemas, to evaluate the validity of his or her beliefs and assumptions, and to view events and situations with greater objectivity.
<h3>What is meant by the cognitive?</h3>
This is the term that is use to refer to the ability of a person to have well developed thinking. It is the ability of a person to be alert mentally.
It is the term that is used to refer to the process of knowing. Hence we can say that An intervention based on cognitive-behavioral principles will teach the client to recognize the content and impact of their cognitions (thoughts) and schemas.
Read more on cognitive here: brainly.com/question/7184301
#SPJ1
The given statement is false.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Objections raised by the customer side are generally based on the price of the product, old-fashioned brush-offs, competitor products or product fits. It is customary to object the products in the market by the buyers.
Objections may be classified into four types namely,
- Price of the product
- Relationship/Trust
- Quality of service
- Customary stall
From the statement given in the question we can interpret that the customer has lost the trust on the after sales services of the copier. Therefore, we can conclude that the statement is an example of objection due to quality of service.
Answer:
The computer manufacturer likely uses "Global Sourcing" as an entry strategy.
Explanation:
Global Sourcing:
It is such a strategy of doing business in which services or products are acquired from a place that gives us a lowest price and good quality. That place can be anywhere in the world.
Example:
A shoe making company is getting its raw material from a neighboring country and marketing services from another country. The company is following the strategy of global sourcing.
- In our situation, the computer manufacturer is getting different components from different countries and this strategy is global sourcing.
The statement about the cases such as Lochner v. New York (1905) and Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) is: False.
<h3 /><h3>What was the Supreme Court Ruling?</h3>
The ruling by the Supreme court in both cases gave more rights to the individuals involved than the federal or state government.
In the Lochner v. New York (1905) case, the supreme court ruled that it was unlawful for the New York State Law to set the maximum working hours for bakers because it violated their rights.
In the second case, the court ruled against a federal law that promoted child labor.
Learn more about the principle of self-government here:
brainly.com/question/6347343
Answer:
(A). To change the system so that it affords the peasant the least disadvantage.
Explanation:
