Answer:
The answer is the Enlightenment.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment was a period during which the source of all knowledge was believed to be based on reason and the senses. It took place between the 17th and 19th century.
Intellectuals of the time used to circulate their ideas through academic meetings, as well as books and journals.
The stage of developing a critical perspective where you look for patterns is the analysis stage.
<h3 /><h3>What are the stages of developing a critical perspective?</h3>
There are five essential stages derived from this theoretical approach, the first being description, where the focus is on researching and summarizing a topic. In the second stage of analysis, there is a need to look for patterns. The third stage is related to the interpretation of your findings.
The 4th stage is related to the critical evaluation of the results and the fifth corresponds to the engagement, which generates action on the individual's critical perspective.
Therefore, a critical perspective is essential for the evolution of society, as it generates greater rationalization of facts, creativity, innovation and new ideas.
Find out more about critical thinking here:
brainly.com/question/25434379
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is the enlightenment effect.
Explanation:
The name is an analogy to the Age of Enlightenment in history. During this period, philosophers and scientists circulated their works through books, journals and scientific meetings. Some consider Isaac Newton's <em>Principia Mathematica</em> to be the first work from this period.
The Enlightenment viewed reason and sensorial evidence as the primary source for knowledge.
The name of the effect from the example thus implies that a research can be circulated world-wide and raise awareness of any given behaviours.
It means that the contribution of someone that give their all to a certain effort often much more valuable compared to half-meaning efforts that given by more than one individuals.
This view often implemented in jobs such as programming and accounting, when more than one perspective could alter the final outcome of the works done.
