Hi!
Your answer is B.
It is <u><em>not</em></u> A because this doesn't really make sense. It's not the best answer.
It <u><em>is</em></u> B because, in sentences, the words around it will likely give the information you need to infer what the word means.
(For example, if I were to say "<em>She was </em><u><em>continuously</em></u><em> singing, for yesterday she sang for 4 straight hours, and it was extremely annoying</em>", pretend you do not know what "continuously" means. By using the words around it, such as "4 straight hours" you can predict that it means "never stopping".)
It is <u><em>not</em></u> C because not every single sentence contains a synonym or antonym.
(See the sentence above. The antonym of "continuously" would be 'never' or 'sometimes' or possibly 'discontinous'. There isn't always an antonym or synonym there, is there?)
It is <u><em>not</em></u> D because not every single word is defined in a passage.
(When you open an average book, is there just an entire page(s) dedicated to every single definition of a word? Most often, no, there is not.)
Answer:
Towns developed near oases because they were a source of water and they need water to live and so do animals. They also can settle to farm and get food, bathing, etc
Explanation:
Answer:
The ability to pay attention to one message and ignore others, yet hear distinctive features of the unattended messages.
Explanation:
In psychology, the term cocktail party effect refers to the phenomenon by which <u>the brain can focus its attention on a particular stimulus while filtering out the other stimuli that are not relevant to it.</u> This phenomenon happens especially at places where there's a lot of noise where the listener is able to focus his/her attention in one particular stimulus. However,<u> if there is a distinctive stimulus (like someone saying your name) you can hear this part of the message</u> even if your attention is focused somewhere else.
Therefore, we can conclude that the cocktail party effect is the ability to pay attention to one message and ignore others, yet hear distinctive features of the unattended messages.
Answer:
When using judicial restraint, a judge will usually defer to the decisions of the elected branches of government.
Explanation:
The theory by which the powers of the judges are restricted and limited to strike down the laws is said to be judicial restraint. Judicial activism is the opposite of judicial restraint. The unconstitutional laws are subjected to be stroked down by the judges. The judicial restraint curtails the power of the judges unless the laws are unconstitutional.
Answer:
subjective experience
Explanation:
Subjective experience: In psychology, the term "subjective experience" is defined as one of the different components of emotions that involves feelings of an individual. It describes an individual's cognitive and emotional impact on his or her experiences and is being produced by his or her own mind. It is being determined or derives by an individual's physical activity instead of the actual performances.
In the question above, the given statement represents the "subjective experience".
