Answer:
In a decimal it would be 177.577
In a fraction it would be 177 577/1000
Answer:
Third graph down
Step-by-step explanation:
2x -6 ≥ 6(x-2)+8
Distribute
2x - 6≥6x -12+8
Combine like terms
2x - 6≥6x -4
Subtract 2x from each side
2x-6-2x ≥6x-2x-4
-6 ≥4x-12
Add 4 to each side
-6+4 ≥4x-4+4
-2 ≥4x
Divide by 4
-2/4 ≥4x/4
-1/2≥x
Closed circle at -1/2
Line going the the left
Answer:
should be 15...
Step-by-step explanation:
We cannot use CPCTC to show that BE is congruent to DE.
CPCTC refers to the angles and sides of two congruent triangles being congruent to their corresponding pieces. The height of a triangle is not one of the given sides that counts in this.
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
