Answer:
The status of women in Nepal has varied throughout history. In the early 1990s, like in some other Asian countries, women in Nepal were generally subordinate to men in virtually every aspect of life. Historically, Nepal has predominantly been a patriarchal society where ... Also, social norms and values were biased in favor of men.
Explanation:
and thats it hope it helps
Predict, Influence
Organizational Behavior(OB) entails the
study of actions that affect performance in the workplace.
The goal of OB theorists is to understand, explain,
predict, and influence behavior to improve performance. Thoughts
influence behavior and what happens to people and thus affect self-confidence to
perform a specific task.
<span>Supreme Court of Oregon affirmed. Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. It was used to justify both sex discrimination and usage of labor laws. ... The ruling had important implications for protective labor legislation.</span>
Answer:
What makes these three governments different? BRAZIL, MEXICO, CUBA. BRAZIL. Official Name: Federative Republic of Brazil; Brazil is a federal republic with the power ... ( like the USA); The president serves a 4 year term with a limit of two terms ( like the USA) ... Examples of Brazilian political parties:.
Explanation:
Explanation:
Answer:
Laura's lawsuit against Bolivia will most likely not prevail because of the Act of state doctrine.
Explanation:
According to this Act, a sovereign state (United States) must respect the independence of any other sovereign state (Bolivia) and, as a result, all the laws and regulations that such sovereign state sets forth. If no US dollars are allowed to enter Bolivia, US citizens traveling to such country have to change US dollars for "Bolivianos", which is the currency used in Bolivia.
In addition, a court (a US court in this case) is not entitled to hear a case where a foreign issue is involved (the fact of exchanging foreign currency). This case cannot be heard nor decided by a US court because that would interfere with the US foreign policy (with Bolivia in this case).
