Answer:
(-6,5)
Step-by-step explanation:
ignore this part
Problem 1
<h3>Answer: choice B) They are supplementary angles</h3>
--------------
Explanation:
The two angles combine to form a straight angle (which is 180 degrees). Another term for these angles is "linear pair" since they form a straight line.
=================================================
Problem 2
<h3>Answer: choice B) x = 7</h3>
--------------
Explanation:
The diagonal is never used in this problem. For any rhombus, the four exterior sides are always the same length.
=================================================
Problem 3
<h3>Answer: Choice D) 62 degrees</h3>
----------------
Explanation:
We use the angle addition postulate. This allows us to combine angles BAC and CAD to form angle BAD.
(angle BAC)+(angle CAD) = angle BAD
30 + x = 92
x = 92-30
x = 62
angle CAD = 62
Answer:
1.5 years
Step-by-step explanation:
She will give up making $28,000 per year for 2 years. This means that she will give up making $56,000 in total.
$28,000 × 2 = $56,000
She also pay $34,000 in total to costs to get her degree. She invested a total of $90,000.
$56,000 + $34,000 = $90,000
After graduating, she makes $60,000 a year. It will take her 1.5 years to recover her investment.
90,000/60,000 = 1.5
Answer:
Charlene claim is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
Max claims that a point on any line that is perpendicular to a segment is equidistant from a segment's endpoints.
It is not necessary as shown in the diagram (a).
Charlene claims that the line must be a perpendicular bisector for a point on the line to be equidistant from a segment's endpoints.
It is true as shown in the diagram (b).
So, Charlene claim is true.
