It is going through a physical change
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
0.000538 mol Pb
<h3>
General Formulas and Concepts:</h3>
<u>Math</u>
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
<u>Chemistry</u>
<u>Atomic Structure</u>
- Avogadro's Number - 6.022 × 10²³ atoms, molecules, formula units, etc.
<u>Stoichiometry</u>
- Using Dimensional Analysis
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
3.24 × 10²⁰ particles Pb (lead)
<u>Step 2: Identify Conversions</u>
Avogadro's Number
<u>Step 3: Convert</u>
- Set up:

- Multiply/Divide:

<u>Step 4: Check</u>
<em>Follow sig fig rules and round. We are given 3 sig figs.</em>
Our final answer is in 3 sig figs, no need to round.
The answer is lower. when there’s a lower temperature the molecules will be moving at a lower speed. a lower speed means less thermal energy.
Answer:
Chlorine is more likely to steal a valence electron from sodium.
Explanation:
Sodium is number 11 on the periodic table with one valence electron. Belonging to the first group, it's one of the alkali metal, which are known to be highly reactive. Chlorine is number 17 with seven valence electrons, and it's in the second-to-last group of halogens--also very reactive.
Considering that elements with one valence electron are just about 100% likely to give up electrons to reach a stable state, sodium would be the element that is more likely to lose its valence electron to chlorine. In other words, chlorine would be the electron thief.
Answer:
This formula contains 12 oxygen atoms.