Answer:
No I think it's wrong.
Actually as long as their were great Christians, they do the best things to make Jesus teachings a heritage and as well as social norms
Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
<span>America's desire to claim territory in Europe
</span>
The USA was not interested in any territory in Europe, unlike European countries, that had imperialistic ambitions. The USA merchant interests were at the core of the desire to join the war.
<span /><span />
