1. Cuando encendí la radio, las noticias .......... (terminar)
2. El centro comercial ....... (no / abierto) aún cuando llegué
3. ……………. (le dices) la verdad a tus padres?
4. El señor Palmer .......... (no / hablar) ningún chino antes de mudarse a pekín
{ y = 3 x - 4
9x -3y = 14
Subsititute y = 3x-4 :
[ 9 x - 3 ( 3 x-14 )=14]
Refine:
9 x - 3 ( 3 x - 4 ) = 14
- 2 = 0
is false , therefore the system of equations has no solution
Answer A
hope this helps!
Answer:
80 :D!
Step-by-step explanation:
30 + (6 x 7) + 8
30 + 42 + 8
72 + 8
= 80
Hope this helps! Brainliest plz?
Answer:
Either A or C I think, Good luck!!!
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)