It is true hope this helped :)))
The answer is response inhibition or also known as inhibitory control.
This is a trademark of control. It is a mental process that allows an
individual to constrain their impulses and natural, habitual,
or dominant behavioral reactions to stimuli. In other terms,
this concept refers to the suppression of no longer needed or inapt actions
which supports flexible and goal-directed behavior in ever-changing
environments.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer:
Explanation:
A recent study of college students from low-SES backgrounds and high-SES backgrounds conducted by VanKim and Laska showed that college students from low-SES backgrounds ate more fast food and fewer fruits and vegetables than their higher-SES counterparts. According to them "Higher nutritional knowledge, which is associated with a greater SES, is associated with engagement in more healthful weight-loss methods".
