Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the first receipt:
2 pounds of grapes + 4 pounds of oranges = 10.70 which, in an algebraic equation, looks like this:
2g + 4o = 10.70
From the second receipt:
3 pounds of grapes + 2 pounds of oranges = 9.65 which, in an algebraic equation, looks like this:
3g + 2o = 9.65
Putting those together into a system and solving using the elimination method:
2g + 4o = 10.7
3g + 2o = 9.65
I am going to eliminate the oranges first since it's easier to do that. I will multiply the second equation by -2 to get a new system:
2g + 4o = 10.7
-6g - 4o = -19.3
As you can see, the oranges are eliminated because 4o - 4o = 0o. That leaves us with only the grapes:
-4g = -8.6 so
g = 2.15
Grapes cost $2.15 per pound. Now sub that into either one of the original equations to solve for the cost per pound of oranges:
2(2.15) + 4o = 10.7 and
4.3 + 4o = 10.7 and
4o = 6.4 so
o = 1.60
Oranges cost $1.60 per pound. That is choice D from your list.
Answer:
can you tell me please
Step-by-step explanation:
nicest
Answer:
Fail to reject the null hypothesis because 0.15>0.05
. There is not convincing evidence that defensive players can bench-press more weight, on average, than offensive players.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since P>a we can not reject the null hypothesis. We cannot conclude the alternative hypothesis in context.
Answer:
219
Step-by-step explanation:
83 + 119 = 202
202 + 17 = 219
Hey I have posted a picture the method I use to solve simultaneous equations is change the sign and follow the new sign.
This involves changing the sign for the second equation and solving it
