Sports are frequently the epitome "of win-lose" activities. In a blog post I made a few months back, I discussed "positional" discussions, in which both parties view the other as an enemy. Such "zero sum" agreements are win-lose situations.
<h3>What is leverage in negotiations ?</h3>
Establishing leverage in negotiations is regarded as being more important than almost everything else in supply management, sometimes being compared to either a silver bullet or the Holy Grail. I reject this viewpoint, and I'll explain why in the next columns. I'll make use of two analogies to do this.
In this article, negotiation leverage will be contrasted with sporting competitions. It will be related to the problem of managing personal relationships in the next one.
Overall, leverage is a technique that, more often than not, fosters adversarial relationships. This is acceptable if you're engaged in a wrestling match or, in the case of commodities, if you just need the provider for the pieces you purchase and have access to other equivalent suppliers for everything else.
Leverage is a tactic, though, that frequently does not result in the best outcome when you have costs above piece-price.
To learn more about Leverage reffer to :
brainly.com/question/28195875
#SPJ4